1. Izguglaj šta je protestantska etika i možda skontas zašto Britanci nisu lenji ni u kom slučaju, nasuprot.Lavlje_srce wrote: 26 Dec 2020, 00:47Ma nemoj? Nemam obicaj pisati stvari koje ne poznajem. Izraz 'Paki' je izuzetno rasisticki. Evo malo besplatne edukacije:saint_mirad wrote: 25 Dec 2020, 20:46Paki je samo skraćeno po Pakistanac, tako ih inače i zovu u slengu. Ni blizu ksenofobije.
Paki is a term typically directed towards people of South Asian descent, and as a racial slur is often used indiscriminately towards people of perceived South Asian descent in general. The slur is used primarily in English-speaking countries. In the United Kingdom, Scandinavia and Canada, the term "Paki" is commonly associated with "Paki-bashing", which consist of violent attacks against people of South Asian origin.
"Paki" is derived from the exonym Pakistan. The term Pak (پاک) means "pure" in Persian, Urdu and Pashto. There was no "Pak" or "Paki" ethnic group before the state was created. The name of Pakistan was coined by the Cambridge University political science student and Muslim nationalist Rahmat Ali, and was published on 28 January 1933 in the pamphlet Now or Never.
The use of the term "Paki" was first recorded in 1964, during a period of increased South Asian immigration to the United Kingdom. At this time the term "Paki" was very much in mixed usage it was used as a slur by some but also as an abbreviation by most others and was not considered any more offensive than the term Brits, Aussies or Kiwis. In addition to Pakistanis (which included Bangladeshis up until 1971), it has also been directed at people of other South Asian backgrounds as well as people from other demographics who physically resemble South Asians. Starting in the late 1960s, and peaking in the 1970s and 1980s, violent gangs opposed to immigration took part in attacks known as "Paki-bashing", which targeted and assaulted South Asians and businesses owned by them, and occasionally other ethnic minorities.
"Paki-bashing" became more common after Enoch Powell's Rivers of Blood speech in 1968;polls at the time showed that Powell's anti-immigrant rhetoric held support among sectors of the white populace at the time. "Paki-bashing" peaked during the 1970s–1980s, with the attackers often being supporters of far-right fascist, racist and anti-immigrant movements, including the white power skinheads, the National Front, and the British National Party. These attacks were usually referred to as either "Paki-bashing" or "skinhead terror", with the attackers usually called "Paki-bashers" or "skinheads". While the attackers were predominantly white, there were also instances of black skinheads engaging in "Paki-bashing" violence.
"Paki-bashing" was partly fuelled by the media's anti-immigrant and anti-Pakistani rhetoric at the time, and by systemic failures of state authorities, which included under-reporting racist attacks, the criminal justice system not taking racist violence seriously, constant racial harassment by police, and sometimes police involvement in racist violence. Asians were frequently stereotyped as "weak" and "passive" in the 1960s and 1970s, with Pakistanis viewed as "passive objects" and "unwilling to fight back", making them seen as easy targets by "Paki-bashers". The Joint Campaign Against Racism committee reported that there had been more than 20,000 racist attacks on British people of colour, including Britons of South Asian origin, during 1985.
Drawing inspiration from the Civil rights movement, the black power movement, and the anti-apartheid movement, young British Asian activists began a number of anti-racist youth movements against "Paki-bashing", including the Bradford Youth Movement in 1977, the Bangladeshi Youth Movement following the murder of Altab Ali in 1978, and the Newham Youth Movement following the murder of Akhtar Ali Baig in 1980.
In December 2000, the Advertising Standards Authority published research on attitudes of the British public to pejoratives. It ranked Paki as the tenth severest pejorative in the English language, up from 17th three years earlier.
Several scholars have compared Islamophobic street violence in the 2000s and 2010s to that of Paki-bashing in the 1970s and 1980s. Robert Lambert notes that a key difference is that, whereas the National Front and BNP targeted all British South Asians (including Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs), the EDL specifically target British Muslims. Lambert also compares the media's role in fuelling "Paki-bashing" in the late 20th century to its role in fuelling Islamophobic sentiment in the early 21st century. Geddes notes that variations of the "Paki" racial slur are occasionally used by members of the English Defence League.
Ako ti odgovara da metodom asocijacije budes povezan s ovakvima, samo naprijed.
1) Kakve veze ima kolonizacija s lijenoscu? Kolonizacija ima veze s pamecu (koju im je tesko osporiti) i agresivnoscu, a mozda ponajvise sa intergeneracijskim sense-om of entitlement, sto ih ne cini vrijednima. Vole sefovati doduse.1. Teško se može nazvati lenjom nacija koja je kolonizovala 3/4 planete, koliko god nategnuli značenje prideva.
2. Ne dovedu baš, imas grooming gangs što siluju maloletnice i honour killings u sred Londona. U nekim četvrtima se primenjuje i šerijatski sud, pa ti vidi. Još sad su Britanci postali previše politički korektni i ne insistiraju na integraciji po svaku cenu jer se mogu uvrediti migrantska osećanja i religija
2) Auuu, rasizam ti izbija iz svake rijeci. Odkad su kriminalci i kriminal prerogativ Azijata? Rekla bih da 'grooming gangs' prednjace kod tzv. bijelaca. Honor killings se ne mogu vezati za religiju kao sto ti cinis, ima ih i kod Juznoamerikanaca, Afrikanaca, Hindusa, mislim da Hindusi prednjace, mada je svako 'ubistvo radi casti' naravno krajnje degutantno.
Bas kao i tvoj kompletan post.
2. Izguglaj grooming gangs Rotherham i karticu images. Srećno. Zna se koja civilizacija tretira žene kao građane drugog reda, otuda je kod njih grooming i normalizovan. Napaceni su i nisu navikli na zapadne žene koje nisu zamotane u nikabe. Honor killings se veže za kulturu kojoj je osnova u religiji, pa ti skontaj.
Nije rasizam kad kažeš kako jest.
Dakle nesto sto moze u bilo kom kontekstu biti povezano s rjecju 'etika' je dovelo do porobljavana, pljackanja i ropstva / nadnicarenja sirom svijeta? Sta je onda dovelo do portugalskog, spanskog, osmanskog, japanskog i ruskog imperijalizma? Katolicka, islamska, pravoslavna i budisticka 'etika'?
![Forum [Bot]](./images/ranks/s.png "Forum [Bot]")
Ima i nažalost male djece Behko . Nekako me stegne oko srca i sjetim se nas 92-ge.