Moderators: Krokodil Behko, Duminjo
Isti klinac, i Indijci i Pakistanci..ironman wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:03 A vijesti u mp3..
Kao da neko accidentally on purpose filtrira..
Dje je vijest o djecaku u Indiji sto je biciklom naletio na kravu?
to je poseban topik i levelironman wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:03 A vijesti u mp3..
Kao da neko accidentally on purpose filtrira..
Dje je vijest o djecaku u Indiji sto je biciklom naletio na kravu?
200 miliona ljudi.CikCikCikPogodi wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 13:58Stradaju li oviThe 51st State wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 12:24
zvanicno su islamska republika pakistan po nazivu ako se ne varam, imaju zakone protiv blasfemije, mnogo ljudi nastrada nevino zbog potvore.
Vidimu loze ko bor.
Ili ovi
Ima siri asortiman robe nego Mercator.
Potpuno te razumijem.
Ma Indijci, su em prljavi, em zive sa majmunima, em korumpirani, em ih ima ko mrava..
Podplatis lokalne policajce i hodzu kojom flasom i miran.The 51st State wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:07200 miliona ljudi.CikCikCikPogodi wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 13:58
Stradaju li ovi
Vidimu loze ko bor.
Ili ovi
Ima siri asortiman robe nego Mercator.
A u sustini imas vecinu i pakistanaca i indjaca koji su normalni ljudi (sve sa higijenom)animals wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:09Ma Indijci, su em prljavi, em zive sa majmunima, em korumpirani, em ih ima ko mrava..ironman wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:07
Potpuno te razumijem.
Ali ovdje i sada se forsira i potencira iskljucivo jedna strana.
A znamo i zasto..
Yeboto.
dje ce valjati..a od Pakistanaca ih razdvaja samo religija, a u sustini su potpuno isti..
Pa od 1,5 milijarde se nadje i pokoji normalan..MorningStar wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:10A u sustini imas vecinu i pakistanaca i indjaca koji su normalni ljudi (sve sa higijenom)animals wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:09
Ma Indijci, su em prljavi, em zive sa majmunima, em korumpirani, em ih ima ko mrava..
dje ce valjati..a od Pakistanaca ih razdvaja samo religija, a u sustini su potpuno isti..
Indijci i pakistanci hoce raditi... Kriminal 0 bodova - dok afghanci bgmanimals wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:12Pa od 1,5 milijarde se nadje i pokoji normalan..MorningStar wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:10
A u sustini imas vecinu i pakistanaca i indjaca koji su normalni ljudi (sve sa higijenom)
Za Afgane si u pravu..MorningStar wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:13Indijci i pakistanci hoce raditi... Kriminal 0 bodova - dok afghanci bgm
Odlično radeMorningStar wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:13Indijci i pakistanci hoce raditi... Kriminal 0 bodova - dok afghanci bgm
Balansira Kina (koja je i dala nuklearnu tehnogiju pakistanu) inace bi Pakistan bio u skripcu. Sta kazu - enemy of my enemy ...
Ne.MorningStar wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:27Balansira Kina (koja je i dala nuklearnu tehnogiju pakistanu) inace bi Pakistan bio u skripcu. Sta kazu - enemy of my enemy ...
ironman wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:29Ne.MorningStar wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 14:27
Balansira Kina (koja je i dala nuklearnu tehnogiju pakistanu) inace bi Pakistan bio u skripcu. Sta kazu - enemy of my enemy ...
Pakistanci su atomsku slozili zahvaljujuc britancima.
Jer su tri naucnika od koji je jedan ostao ziv" prebjegla "iz GB u Pakistan..tu je bio kljuc njihovog nuklearnog programa..
Kina je samo paravan.
China's professed opposition to sharing nuclear weapons technology with non-nuclear states may have led to compromise of principle when security and economic interests were at stake. Well before the question of nuclear sharing emerged, China and Pakistan, each having an adversarial relationship with India, had developed a close understanding involving significant military cooperation. When the U.S. cut off sales of weapons to both India and Pakistan because of their 1965 border conflict, China became Pakistan's main supplier of weapons. The close relationship with China became one of the pillars of Pakistani foreign policy. When India held its first nuclear test in 1974, and Pakistan made decisions to acquire its own capability to build nuclear weapons, it may have seemed a matter of course for elements in the Chinese military, which had a powerful voice in Beijing's nuclear establishment, eventually to decide to lend Pakistan a hand. (Note 4)
The interests that propelled Beijing to assist Pakistan's nuclear program became competitive, during the 1980s and 1990s, with other sets of interests pushing for a stronger Chinese role in global nuclear nonproliferation efforts. While reports of Beijing's transfer of nuclear weapons designs and sensitive technologies circulated, the two governments signed a nuclear cooperation agreement and conducted negotiations over the sale of Chinese nuclear reactors. At the same time, Beijing became a full member of the nuclear nonproliferation regime, joining the International Atomic Energy Authority in 1984 and signing the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in 1992 and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1995. Moreover, China began to work closely with Washington and other powers in trying to curb the North Korean nuclear program and in restricting trade in sensitive nuclear technology. As China's market economy developed greater complexity, central authorities could not always control events, which is what may happened when a Chinese firm sold ring magnets used for the production of highly enriched uranium to Pakistan in 1995. (Note 5)
Exactly what the United States government knew (or believed it knew) about Chinese nuclear sharing with Pakistan and when it knew it, remains highly secret. So far no intelligence reports on the issues have been declassified, although during the Clinton years Washington Times correspondent Bill Gertz published highly damaging communications intercepts on Chinese-Pakistan nuclear transactions in 1996. (Note 6) In light of the sensitivities involved--U.S. relations with two highly important partners, Pakistan and China--the relevant details may not be declassified for many years. Moreover, the presidential records that would shed light on how consecutive administrations tried to reconcile the larger goal of engagement with Beijing with specific concerns about nuclear proliferation issues remain secret. Within the limits imposed by the secrecy system, this briefing book sheds light on how U.S. government officials looked at the China-Pakistan nuclear relationship, their persistent efforts to discourage it, the repeated denials by Chinese diplomats, and the evolution of China's nuclear nonproliferation policy.