Emancipacija žena kod Arapa

[Fuddo]

A ko da mi je neka novost da svaki zaosinuti mali fasista sirom dunjaluka jedva ceka da zaosinuta budala pocne pravit ameriku great again.
Samo ne znam sto mislite da bi vam on izasao u susret u ispunjavanju mokrih snova orbana i slicnih?

Naravno.
Čovjek je realist ,poslovni čovjek i političar ne voli komplicirati.
Imat će puno posla dok ispravi sve što je Bidenova administracija u međuvremenu zagovnala.

Very stable genius

Trebali ste ga poslusat kad vam je predlagao da se varikine napijete.

[harlekin]

Ne Amerika,nego Demokrati,koji su trenutno na vlasti.
Ali samo polako,vratit će se Trump na vlast,već za 2 godine.

A ko da mi je neka novost da svaki zaosinuti mali fasista sirom dunjaluka jedva ceka da zaosinuta budala pocne pravit ameriku great again.
Samo ne znam sto mislite da bi vam on izasao u susret u ispunjavanju mokrih snova orbana i slicnih?

Pa cak ni orban i slicni ne melju nepozeljne novinare kao ovi vasi saveznici.
Tako da orban i slicni djeluju kao pozitivci u poredjenju s onim sto vi podrzavate kao dicni demokrati.

[Fuddo]

A ko da mi je neka novost da svaki zaosinuti mali fasista sirom dunjaluka jedva ceka da zaosinuta budala pocne pravit ameriku great again.
Samo ne znam sto mislite da bi vam on izasao u susret u ispunjavanju mokrih snova orbana i slicnih?

Pa cak ni orban i slicni ne melju nepozeljne novinare kao ovi vasi saveznici.
Tako da orban i slicni djeluju kao pozitivci u poredjenju s onim sto vi podrzavate kao dicni demokrati.

Zali se unproforu

[milanbilic]

Saudijska Arabija je najsupackija drzava.
Ali eto Amerima ne pada na pamet da njima uvide demokratiju, jer ruka ruku gladi.

Njima su oni odavno uveli demokratiju kad su ubili kralja fejsala i postavili svoju marionetsku vladu

[harlekin]

Pa cak ni orban i slicni ne melju nepozeljne novinare kao ovi vasi saveznici.
Tako da orban i slicni djeluju kao pozitivci u poredjenju s onim sto vi podrzavate kao dicni demokrati.

Zali se unproforu

Ma jest bas mene sekira neki novinar,samo dokazano orban bolji nego oni sto vi podrzavate,tako da ne laprdaj o coeku.

[Krokodil Behko]

Arapska princeza ostavila supruga putem Instagrama: Pošto si zauzet drugim prijateljima

Arapska princeza Sheikha Mahra Bint Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum je putem Instagrama ostavila svog supruga Mohammeda Bin Rashida bin Mana Al Maktouma.

"Dragi mužu, pošto si zauzet drugim prijateljima, ovim putem proglašavam naš razvod. Razvodim se od tebe, razvodim se od tebe i razvodim se od tebe. Čuvaj se. Tvoja bivša žena", navela je u objavi.





Mnogi su joj u komentarima pružili podršku zbog ovog poteza.

"Kada jaka žena zna koliko vrijedi. Mashallah", "Smatram da je osnažujuće kada žena prepozna svoju vrijednost i samouvjereno se drži svog mišljenja", "Uvijek sam tu za tebe", neki su od njih.

Nije bilo službenog saopćenja iz kraljevske porodice Maktoum, koja vlada Dubaijem i iz kojeg Sheikha Mahra potiče. Neki njeni pratitelji su naveli da smatraju kako je njen profil hakovan.

Za Mohammeda se udala u maju prošle godine. Prije dva mjeseca su dobili kćerku. S njenog Instagram profila su obrisane sve fotografije na kojima je pozirala s Mohammedom.

Ona je nedavno podijelila fotografiju na kojoj grli kćerku te u opisu navela: "Samo nas dvije". Neki pratitelji misle da je ovom fotografijom još ranije najavila razvod.

[ElTriconi]

Satrat ocam

[Mutevelija]

Ako je muškarac odvojen od žene neki period po Šerijatu ona može tražiti razvod.

Ono ideš ti 6 mjeseci u Njemačku a ona sama

[Mutevelija]

How long can a husband be away from his wife before the wife can claim divorce, according to Sharia law?
Let me paste a scenario from Islamqa

‘’If the wife does not agree to her husband being away for more than six months, the case should be referred to the qadi (judge) so that he can correspond with her husband and order him to return. If he does not return, then the judge may rule as he sees fit, either divorce or annulment of the marriage. This applies whether the husband is travelling and absent for a reason such as needing money and not being able to find work in his own country, or if there is no excuse, rather it is for love of money, as mentioned in the question.

But the difference between there being an excuse and there being no excuse is that if the husband has an excuse, he is not obliged to return, and he is not sinning if he does not return.

But if he has no excuse, then he must return and he is sinning if he does not return.

In either case the wife has the right to ask for a divorce, so as to ward off harm from herself.

It is not permissible for the husband to keep his wife if she is being harmed. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“But do not take them back to hurt them”

[al-Baqarah 2:231]

“either take them back in a good manner or part with them in a good manner”

[al-Talaq 65:2]

It says in Kashshaf al-Qina (5/193): If the husband travels and leaves her because of an excuse or need, then her right to a share of his time and intimacy is waived, even if his journey is lengthy, because there is an excuse. … If the traveller does not have an excuse that prevents him from returning and he is absent for more than six months, if she asks him to return then he must do that, because of the report narrated by Abu Hafs with his isnad from Yazeed ibn Aslam who said:

Whilst ‘Umar was patrolling Madeenah, he passed by a woman who was saying:

“This night is getting very long and very dark because I do not have my partner to play with.

By Allah, were it not for the fear of Allah and for modesty, then this bed would shake under me.”

He asked about her and was told that she was So and so whose husband was absent (in jihad) for the sake of Allah. He sent a woman to stay with her, and he sent for her husband to come back. Then he entered upon Hafsah and said: O my daughter, how long can a woman bear to be away from her husband? She said: Subhan Allah, would one such as you ask one such as me about that? He said: Were it not that I want to make a decision concerning the Muslims I would not have asked you. She said: Five months or six months. So he set a time limit for the people on their campaigns of six months: they would march for a month, then stay there for four months, then take another month for the journey back.

He has to come back if he does not have an excuse, such as travelling to seek knowledge or he is on an obligatory campaign or obligatory Hajj, or he is seeking necessary provision, in which case he is not obliged to return, because the one who has an excuse is excused as a result of that. The judge may write to him telling him to return, but if he refuses to return with no excuse after the judge has written to him, then the judge may annul his marriage, because he has failed to do a duty that is required of him and his wife has been harmed by that. End quote.

In al-Mawsoo’ah al-Fiqhiyyah (29/63) it says: If the husband is absent from his wife for any length of time with no excuse, she has the right to ask for a separation from him, but if it is for an excuse then she does not have the right to do that. [This is the Hanbali view].

The Malikis are of the view that if the man is absent from his wife for a while, she has the right to ask for a separation from him, whether this journey is for a valid reason or not, because her right to intimacy is binding. End quote.

Ash-Shaykh Ibn Jibreen (may Allah preserve him) was asked: I am a young man living abroad and I am married, praise be to Allah, but the country in which I am working only allows a few employees to bring their wives. What is the Islamic ruling on that, as the job is only for a year or fourteen months to be precise?

He replied: Some of the Sahabah set a limit for a husband’s absence at four months, and others set it at half a year, but that applies when a wife has asked her husband to come back. If he has been away for half a year and she asks him to come back and he is able to, then he must come back. If he refuses then she has the right to refer the matter to the qadi (judge) and have the marriage annulled. But if she allows her husband to stay, even if it is for a long time, and more than one or two years, then there is nothing wrong with that because it is her right that she has waived, so she cannot demand an annulment so long as she has agreed to his being away and so long as her provision, clothing and other needs are assured. And Allah is the Source of strength. End quote from Fatawa Islamiyyah (3/212).

Ash-Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked about a man who was married and had children from his wife. He says: I travelled from my homeland to improve my situation and I was absent for nearly three years. Please note that I never stopped sending money and was in constant touch with my wife. Does she have any rights in sharee’ah and what are they? Is there any sin on me for that?

He (may Allah have mercy on him) replied: I say that the wife’s right over her husband is that he may enjoy intimacy with her and she with him, as is usually the case. If he stays away from her to seek a living with her consent, and she is in a safe place where there is no fear that anything will happen to her, then there is nothing wrong with that, because the right is hers but if she agrees to waive it and she is completely safe and secure, then there is nothing wrong with his being away for three years or more or less. But if she asks him to come back then the matter should be referred to the judges to rule as they see fit in accordance with the laws of Allah, may He be glorified and exalted. End quote from Fatawa Noor ‘ala al-Darb.

To sum up: If the husband is away from his wife for more than six months, if his wife agrees to that and he has left her in a safe place, there is no problem. If she did not agree to that then she may refer her case to the sharee’ah judges to determine whether her husband has a sound excuse or he has to return or the marriage may be annulled.

The husband should understand the effect that his absence will have on his wife and children, and he should put their interests and care before acquiring wealth, if he can find sufficient income in his own country, for nothing can compensate for the calamity of losing one's religious commitment; no wealth or luxury can make up for that. How many families have seen their young men and girls become corrupted because of their father’s absence. We ask Allah to keep us safe and sound.

Hence we advise you to fear Allah and take care of your wife and children. And do what you can to find some money that will enable you to return and settle in your country, or bring them to join you, for the wife has rights and the children have rights, and tomorrow you will be answerable before Allah for this flock.

We ask Allah to help and guide us and you.

And Allah knows best.’’

[Krokodil Behko]

ŽENA MILIONERA IZ DUBAIJA ZAKUKALA: "Muž mi daje samo 70.000 eura dnevno" (VIDEO)

Malika Raja, supruga dubajskog milionera, redovno privlači pažnju javnosti dijeljenjem detalja svog raskošnog života na društvenim mrežama, otkrivajući da, uprkos svakodnevnom šopingu i večerama u skupim restoranima, život nije "bajan". Posebnu buru izazvala je njena izjava u kojoj se požalila da dnevno dobija "samo 70.000 eura džeparca" od supruga.

Iako je njen jedini "posao" da izgleda skupo, život Malike Raja obuhvata i stroga pravila koja su poznata u krugovima bogatih porodica, a o čemu su ranije govorile i dadilje.

70.000 eura dnevno nije dovoljno

Malika Raja često koristi društvene mreže kako bi podijelila detalje svog luksuznog načina života, koji se uglavnom svodi na kupovinu dizajnerskih torbi i posjete fensi restoranima. Međutim, ona tvrdi da i takav život ima nedostataka.

"Ja sam žena milionera, moj jedini posao je da izgledam skupo! Biti domaćica iz Dubaija ima svoje prednosti i mane," najavljuje ona u jednom snimku.

U drugom, kontroverznom snimku, Malika Raja sjedi u zadnjem dijelu automobila pored svog usnulog sina i vodi razgovor sa suprugom:

"Mogu li da sjednem naprijed, molim te?", pita muža koji vozi automobil. Muž joj kaže da ne može, a na pitanje zašto – kaže da je njen posao da čuva sina.




Domaćica iz Dubaija se ponekad požali i na stres, tvrdeći da nije "sve tako bajno" kao što se čini. Čini se da nije zadovoljna ni finansijskim aspektom, s obzirom na izjavu:

"Moj muž milioner mi daje džeparac od samo 70.000 eura 24 sata."


Reakcije na društvenim mrežama: "razmaženo derište"

Nakon ove izjave, uslijedio je val kritika na društvenim mrežama. Mnogi su je optužili za bahatost i za to što ne cijeni udobnost koju joj muž pruža, dok su drugi pokazali razumijevanje za sistem kontrole u bogatim porodicama.

Korisnici društvenih mreža iznijeli su oštre komentare:

"Ti si razmaženo derište," bio je jedan od komentara.

Ipak, većina se složila da bi prihvatili takav životni stil bez prigovora.

"Sjediću pozadi samo da imam takav stil života," dodali su na mrežama.

Ova priča naglašava disparatnost između ekstremnog bogatstva i osjećaja sreće, ali i ukazuje na rigidna pravila koja vladaju unutar najbogatijih porodica Dubaija.