
AMERIKA
Moderators: Krokodil Behko, Duminjo
Re: AMERIKA
U mom gradu VERIZON nas prodao FRONTIJER-U, meni nepoznata firma . Internet jako spor.
, cijen ista.


Re: AMERIKA
Ima li ko da ne mrzi Ameriku više od četnika?
Ostavljam profil na forumu u amanet dobrim ljudima
USERNAME: Lebowski
PASSWORD: 123456
Dobri ljudi, uđite i promijenite šifru i riješite se kjafira.
USERNAME: Lebowski
PASSWORD: 123456
Dobri ljudi, uđite i promijenite šifru i riješite se kjafira.
- Mohr
- Inventar foruma
- Posts: 9020
- Joined: 16 Aug 2015, 21:15
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
- Status: Offline
Re: AMERIKA
Sometime TomDispatch contributor, William Hartung, has an op-ed at the New York Times online today -- as the president arrives in Saudi Arabia -- calling for him to stop selling piles of arms (and especially cluster bombs) to that country. It's one of those scandals of everyday life in Washington that never gets the attention it should. The U.S. is essentially providing the arms (including essentially illegal ones) and the know-how for the Saudis to conduct their brutal dead-end war in Yemen. Good for Hartung to bring it up. Tom
"When President Obama visits Saudi Arabia this week for a meeting with representatives from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he should avoid doing what he did at Camp David last May, the last time he met with them: promise more arms sales. Since Mr. Obama hosted that meeting, the United States has offered over $33 billion in weaponry to its Persian Gulf allies, with the bulk of it going to Saudi Arabia. The results have been deadly.
"The Saudi-American arms deals are a continuation of a booming business that has developed between Washington and Riyadh during the Obama years. In the first six years of the Obama administration, the United States entered into agreements to transfer nearly $50 billion in weaponry to Saudi Arabia, with tens of billions of dollars of additional offers in the pipeline.
"The Pentagon claims that these arms transfers to Saudi Arabia “improve the security of an important partner which has been and continues to be an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East.” Recent Saudi actions suggest otherwise.
"A prime example of what’s wrong with unbridled American weapons transfers to the Saudi government is the Saudi-led war in Yemen. According to the United Nations, more than 3,200 civilians have been killed since Saudi bombing began last March. A majority of these deaths have been a result of airstrikes, many of which have been carried out with aircraft, bombs and missiles supplied by the United States and Britain, including United States-supplied cluster bombs.
"The use of cluster bombs is of particular concern. These munitions are banned by an international treaty — a treaty that neither the United States nor Saudi Arabia has signed. The United States also provides logistical support to the Royal Saudi Air Force for its airstrikes in Yemen."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/20/opini ... .html?_r=0
"When President Obama visits Saudi Arabia this week for a meeting with representatives from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he should avoid doing what he did at Camp David last May, the last time he met with them: promise more arms sales. Since Mr. Obama hosted that meeting, the United States has offered over $33 billion in weaponry to its Persian Gulf allies, with the bulk of it going to Saudi Arabia. The results have been deadly.
"The Saudi-American arms deals are a continuation of a booming business that has developed between Washington and Riyadh during the Obama years. In the first six years of the Obama administration, the United States entered into agreements to transfer nearly $50 billion in weaponry to Saudi Arabia, with tens of billions of dollars of additional offers in the pipeline.
"The Pentagon claims that these arms transfers to Saudi Arabia “improve the security of an important partner which has been and continues to be an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East.” Recent Saudi actions suggest otherwise.
"A prime example of what’s wrong with unbridled American weapons transfers to the Saudi government is the Saudi-led war in Yemen. According to the United Nations, more than 3,200 civilians have been killed since Saudi bombing began last March. A majority of these deaths have been a result of airstrikes, many of which have been carried out with aircraft, bombs and missiles supplied by the United States and Britain, including United States-supplied cluster bombs.
"The use of cluster bombs is of particular concern. These munitions are banned by an international treaty — a treaty that neither the United States nor Saudi Arabia has signed. The United States also provides logistical support to the Royal Saudi Air Force for its airstrikes in Yemen."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/20/opini ... .html?_r=0
- Mohr
- Inventar foruma
- Posts: 9020
- Joined: 16 Aug 2015, 21:15
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
- Status: Offline
Re: AMERIKA
Prošle su sedmice s neba nad Njemačkom padala američka oklopna vozila, kada je vježba američke vojske u vojnoj bazu Hohenfels krenula po zlu, piše RT.
http://globalcir.com/vest/5457
http://globalcir.com/vest/5457
Re: AMERIKA

Starbucks placa oko $10 i nije jednostavno raditi.
Dobijes knjigu sa raznim kombinacijama pravljenja pica i kava -. Nema prestanka ,non -stop - si u pokretu. Svejedno, ko prihvati i ko uspije da prodje obuku , uziva raditi, atmosfera je ta koja ih drzi.
Dobiju i baksis . ameri su tu velikodusni.

Re: AMERIKA
Just 5 NATO countries met NATO’s 2 percent funding threshold in 2015: US, Greece, Poland, the UK & Estonia.


